Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Michael Gilmor, et al v. Preferred Credit Corporation, et al
as 10-8017
Petitioner:
Michael P. Gilmor and Shellie Gilmor
Respondent:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Gilmor v. Preferred Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor, Michael P Gilmor and others
Defendant:
Preferred Credit Corporation, IMPAC Funding Corporation, IMPAC Mortgage Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Joel Sharenow v. Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc., et al
as 09-55533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL SHARENOW
Plaintiff:
SHELDON PITTLEMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC., JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON, WILLIAM S. ASHMORE and others
Sheldon Pittleman v. Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00970
Defendant:
William S Ashmore, Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc, Richard J Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Pittleman and Joel Sharenow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hines v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv61808
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dante Hines
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Richard Abrams v. Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01174
Plaintiff:
Richard Abrams
Defendant:
Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc, Joseph R Tomkinson, William S Ashmore and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lee Tamo v. Joseph R Tomkinson et al
as 8:2007cv00611
Plaintiff:
Lee Tamo, Lee Tamo and Lee Tamo
Defendant:
Joseph R Tomkinson, William S Ashmore, Richard J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
