Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Shariff Butler, et al v. John Wetzel, et al
as 22-8029
Petitioner:
SHARIFF BUTLER and JEREMEY MELVIN
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Department of Corections, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL, Executive Deputy of the Department of Corrections, MELISSA ROBERTS, Former DOC Policy Coordinator and others
Joel Muir v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-3145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J FREEMAN and others
Roscoe Brown v. Smith, et al
as 21-3127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEEINGER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER D'HAPPART and others
Chad Sasse v. John Wetzel, et al
as 21-3033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD ALLEN SASSE
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BARRY R. SMITH, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
Mark Rokita, Jr. v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-2893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK C. ROKITA, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Lavond Hill v. John E. Wetzel, et al
as 21-3009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, ALICIA BERGER and others
Joshua Robinson v. Palco, et al
as 21-2987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PALCO, DIetary Staff, HIXSON, Dietary Staff, BIAN, C.O. and others
William Turner v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-2879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM D. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, CORRECTION CARE SOLUTION, CARL KELDIE and others
Michael Walker, et al v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 21-2756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WALKER and MAURICE PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections
Bernard Jerry-ElIn re: Bernard Jerry-El
as 21-2553
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Respondent:
KEITH A. PESTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
