Cases 11 - 20 of 178
JUSTICE, II v. SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., EDWARD M CHRISTIE, III, CARLTON D DONAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
VICTORIAN FINANCE, LLC v. LAGONI et al
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
VICTORIAN FINANCE, LLC
Defendant:
JEFF LAGONI, DJ HAMMEL, SCOTT COOPER and others
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP v. Boucher & James Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04596
Plaintiff:
CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP
Defendant:
Boucher & James Inc., Ross Boucher, DAVID R. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
PIPER v. JONES et al
as 3:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PIPER, JR.
Defendant:
SHAWN JONES, MICHAEL SATRYAN, FRED PETRUNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
HOPKINS v. SANDERSON FARMS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04389
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
SANDERSON FARMS, INC., FRED BANKS, JR., DAVID BARKSDALE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. STAMPS.COM INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04094
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STAMPS.COM INC., KEN MCBRIDE, MOHAN P ANANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JONES v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03314
Plaintiff:
DANITA JONES
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, SMART SALES AND LEASE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HOPKINS v. BOINGO WIRELESS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02321
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
MAURY AUSTIN, LANCE ROSENZWEIG, BOINGO WIRELESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
