Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
KOWAL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv02798
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA KOWAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KOWAL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00938
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Plaintiff:
BARBARA KOWAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In Re: Request from Poland
as 1:2016mc00361
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Zbigniew Kowal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Fisher et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as OHN/1:16-cv-01868
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mike Fisher , Lee Wilson , David Roberts and others
Audrey I. Kowall et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-06665
Plaintiff:
Audrey I. Kowall and Robert Kowall
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Kowal et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17094
Plaintiff:
Valerie Kowal and Thaddeus Kowal
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Kuritz et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01529
Plaintiff:
Sara A. Knapp, Frederick E. Kowal, Hyman Kuritz and others
Defendant:
Caroline W. Ahl, Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kowall v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, a Delaware Corporation
as 2:2011cv15454
Plaintiff:
Amy E Kowall
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC, a Delaware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
