Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03082
Plaintiff:
Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and Rebecca Froehlich
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jonas et al v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as MN/0:23-CV-03082
Plaintiff:
Jonas, Monet Jonas, Brad Hoag and others
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A, EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A. and others
Morgan v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
Michelle Morgan
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Morgan v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as MN/0:23-CV-03065
Plaintiff:
Morgan and Michelle Morgan
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A, EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A. and others
Fathmath v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 3:2023cv03626
Plaintiff:
Isha Fathmath
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.P.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. Alexander Cheung et al
as 2:2018cv03649
Defendant:
Alexander Cheung and Does
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group, S.p.A.
Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. Eye Story, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03374
Defendant:
Does, Eye Story, Inc. and Eunjiko Ko
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group, S.p.A.
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. FY Eye Optometry Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02459
Defendant:
DOES, FY Eye Optometry Center, Inc. and Sol Regwan
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Asia Pacific Trading Co., Inc.
as 2:2018cv02247
Defendant:
Asia Pacific Trading Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Oakley, Inc. et al v. Asia Pacific Trading Co., Inc.
as 8:2018cv00403
Defendant:
Asia Pacific Trading Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
