Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Michael Gorbey v. Lt. Avery
as 21-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT AVERY, LIEUTENANT SALCITO, WARDEN RATLEDGE and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. US
as 21-6858
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Michael Gorbey v. Lt. Brown
as 21-6848
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER SMITH, Unit Manager Poplar Unit, LIEUTENANT MANNING, FCI Beckley, VEST, FCI Beckley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 21-6820
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. BARNETT, FCI Estill S.C., MS. ULMER, FCI Estill S.C., MASTRO, FCI Estill S.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6800
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6654
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael Owl Feather-Gorbey v. NFN NLN, et al
as 20-10863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey, also known as Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant / Appellee:
NFN NLN, Designation Staff, NFN NLN, Administrator of Designations and U.S. Attorney General, United States
Michael Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 20-6764
Defendant / Appellee:
MOHAMED MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Michael OwlFeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 20-6761
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCI Cumberland
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
