Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Borrello et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff: George M Borrello, Christopher W Tague, Michael Lawler and others
Defendant: Kathleen C Hochul, Mary T. Bassett, The New York State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc. v. United States Department of He
as 22-695
Plaintiff / Appellant: Safe Haven Home Care, Inc., Evergreen Homecare Service of NY Inc., Elim Home Care Agency, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02267
Plaintiff: Safe Haven Home Care, Inc., Evergreen Homecare Service of NY Inc., Elim Home Care Agency, LLC and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Xavier Becerra, United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Andre-Rodney v. Hochul
as 21-2941
Plaintiff / Appellant: Daphne Jane Andre-Rodney, John Ludewig, Orie Monroe and others
Defendant / Appellee: Kathy Hochul, in her official capacity as Governor of New York State, Howard Zucker, in his official capacity as Health Commissioner of New York State, New York State Department of Health and others
Perez v. New York State Department of Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01203
Plaintiff: Patricia S. Perez
Defendant: New York State Department of Health and Howard A. Zucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe v. Franklin Square Union Free Sch
as 21-2759
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jane Doe, on behalf of herseld and her minor child Sarah Doe and Jane Doe, on behalf of herself and her minor child Sarah Doe
Defendant / Appellee: Franklin Square Union Free School District and Howard Zucker, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health
Dr. A. v. Hochul
as 21-2566
Plaintiff / Appellee: Dr. A., Nurse A., Dr. C. and others
Defendant / Appellant: Kathy Hochul, Governor of the State of New York, in her official capacity, Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, in his official capacity and Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, in her official capacity
Petitioner: Former EEOC Employees and Title VII Religious Accommodation Experts
Smith v. Hochul
as 21-2365
Plaintiff: Jane Smith, Jill Park and Dr. Amy Moe
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mary Doe and Ann Jones
Defendant / Appellee: Kathy Hochul, as Governor of the State of New York, Letitia James, as Attorney General of the State of New York in her official capacity, Stephanie Schulman, Deputy Director, Division of Hospitals and Diagnostic and Treatment Centers, New York State Department of Health in her official capacity, FKA Deirdre Astin and others
Andre-Rodney et al v. Hochul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01053
Plaintiff: Daphne Jane Andre-Rodney, John Ludewig, Orie Monroe and others
Defendant: Kathy Hochul, Howard Zucker, New York State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hochul
as 21-2218
Petitioner: Jane Smith, Jill Park, Mary Doe and others
Respondent: Kathy Hochul, as Governor of the State of New York, Letitia James, as Attorney General of the State of New York in her official capacity, Stephanie Schulman, Deputy Director, Division of Hospitals and Diagnostic and Treatment Centers, New York State Department of Health in her official capacity, FKA Deirdre Astin and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?