Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Ravichandran v. TherapeuticsMD, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05160
Plaintiff:
Anto Ravichandran
Defendant:
TherapeuticsMD, Inc., Tommy G. Thompson, Angus C. Russell and others
Wilson v. TherapeuticsMD, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05172
Defendant:
Ryan Wilson, TherapeuticsMD, Inc., Hugh O'Dowd and others
Navarro v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01075
Plaintiff:
Victoria C. Navarro
Defendant:
The State of New York, The New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Sheila J. Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, H. WICKHAM, Deputy Dir. of NDOC, COLLMAN, S C/O Mailroom Super and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
James Hundley v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 21-15757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DERRICK HUNDLEY, AKA Jamee Deirdre Hundley
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BEQUETTE, UTILIZATION REVIEW PANEL, KIM ADAMSON and others
Gerald Von Tobel v. Johns, et al
as 20-16853
Defendant / Appellee:
C. LUCAS, WALLS, LONG, Dr. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD VON TOBEL
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 19-16794
Defendant / Appellee:
HICK-MOSES, W. MILLER, Sgt., ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Seed Company Limited, et al v. Westerman, Hattori, Daniels &, et al
as 19-7086
Defendant / Appellee:
Ed Kenehan, John Kong, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Seed Company Limited and Shigeru Tamai
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
