Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mayfield v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 4:2021cv01048
Plaintiff:
Kimberly P. Mayfield
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Stefan v. Office of Personnel Management
as 3:2018cv02481
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Stefan
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Buchanan v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00765
Plaintiff:
Deborah S Buchanan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Office of Personnel Management and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnley v. US Office of Personnel Management et al
as 4:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murray Burnley, Jr.
Defendant:
US Office of Personnel Management and Teheerah Burton
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Cain v. United States Office of Personnel Management et al
as 5:2009cv00629
Plaintiff:
Sally Rebecca Cain
Defendant:
United States Office of Personnel Management and General Services Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 8701 - Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance Act
Clarke v. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 4:2007cv00662
Plaintiff:
Christopher P Clarke
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management and Linda M Springer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
