Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 20-16068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant:
GERARDO ADRIAN LOPEZ, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, ALBIN RHOMBERG and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TROY NEWMAN
Planned Parenthood Federation, et al v. Center for Medical Progress, et al
as 20-16070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, PLANNED PARENTHOOD/ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC, DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis, CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS and others
Defendant:
TROY NEWMAN, ALBIN RHOMBERG and SANDRA SUSAN MERRITT, AKA Susan Tennenbaum
Planned Parenthood Federation v. Azar II
as 20-31
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Roger T. Severino, in his official capacity as Director, Office for Civil Rights, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
Christian Medical and Dental Association and Dr. Regina Frost
State of New York v. United States Department of He
as 20-41
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Defendant:
Christian Medical and Dental Association, Roger T. Severino, in his official capacity as Director, Office for Civil Rights, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Dr. Regina Frost and others
State of New York v. United States Department of He
as 19-4254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Public Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Christian Medical and Dental Association and others
Defendant:
Office for Civil Rights, United StatesDepartment of Health and Human Services, Roger T. Severino, in his official capacity as Director, Office of Civil Rights, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Roger T. Severino, in his official capacity as Director, Office for Civil Rights, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Strunk v. State of New York
as 19-3991
Defendant / Appellee:
Warren Wilhelm, Jr., Bill De Blasio, individually and as Mayor of New York City, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Carl E. Heastie, New York Assembly Speaker and others
Defendant:
Democratic National Committee, (DNC) by its Chairman Tom Perez
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Earl Strunk
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff:
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae:
the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party:
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae:
the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
