Cases 11 - 20 of 214
Floribel Guevara-Rivas, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13309
Petitioner:
FLORIBEL GUEVARA-RIVAS and JOSE FERNANDO QUINTANILLA-GUEVARA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as MN/0:23-CV-02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Quintanilla-Cortez v. Garland
as 23-1057
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO QUINTANILLA-CORTEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. La Brasa Rustica Restaurant LLC
as 1:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
La Brasa Rustica Restaurant LLC doing business as La Brasa Rustica and Eva Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551 Cable Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Quintanilla
as 23-40033
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ricardo Quintanilla
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. La Brasa Rustica Restaurant LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
La Brasa Rustica Restaurant LLC doing business as La Brasa Rustica and Eva Quintanilla
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551 Cable Communications Act
Flores Quintanilla v. Garland
as 23-74
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR FLORES QUINTANILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez-Quintanilla, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1998
Petitioner:
RHINA ZULEIMA VASQUEZ-QUINTANILLA and DAVID ANTONIO PORTILLO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayala-Quintanilla v. Garland
as 22-60626
Petitioner:
Jeanine Yocanda Ayala-Quintanilla and Eunice Lizeth Sabillon-Ayala
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
