Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Hunter v. Murdoch et al
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant:
William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Rapower-3, LLC et al
as 0:2019mc00078
Defendant:
Rapower-3, LLC, International Automated Systems, Inc., LTB1, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv03253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hartke et al v. WIPT, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv00976
Plaintiff:
Bradley R. Hartke , Douglas P. Hartke and Joan L. Hartke
Defendant:
WIPT, Inc., Roger Dean Waldner, The One Stop, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Roger Dean Waldner, WIPT, Inc., RDW-KILT, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Bradley R. Hartke , Douglas P. Hartke and Joan L. Hartke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Atheists for Human Rights et al v. County of Washington, Minnesota et al
as 0:2014cv03769
Plaintiff:
Atheists for Human Rights and Rodney Michael Rogers
Defendant:
County of Washington, Minnesota and Steve Gransee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv03426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv03392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv02036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
