Cases 11 - 20 of 497
Heghmann v. Biden et al
as 6:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Heghmann
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Micah Cheatham, Jack Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cacho v. DMB Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
DMB Financial, LLC d/b/a American Debt Relief, a Massachusetts Limited Liability Company, Global Holdings LLC and ARNOLD & SMITH LAW, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Martinez v. Heard & Smith, LLP
as 5:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Margaret Martinez
Defendant:
Heard & Smith, LLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lian Smith v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2023cv03301
Plaintiff:
Yi Qin Lian Smith
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou and Wallace Carroll
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
