Cases 11 - 20 of 61
US v. Joseph Smith
as 20-7848
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH THOMAS SMITH, a/k/a Joseph Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Paula Earley v. Wrap Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv09444
Defendant:
Marc Thomas, Thomas Smith, David Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Earley
Joseph Mercurio v. Wrap Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv09030
Defendant:
David Norris, Thomas Smith, Wrap Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mercurio
In re Wrap Technologies, Inc. Securities Exchange Act Litigation
as 2:2020cv08760
Defendant:
David Norris, Thomas Smith, Wrap Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carone Cobden
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Paula Earley and Joseph Mercurio
In Re:
Wrap Technologies, Inc. Securities Exchange Act Litigation
Anant Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 20-15593
Defendant / Appellee:
AKUASI ARHIN, Dr., KARYN E. KLAUSNER, ADOC Attorney, STEVEN BELL, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Anant Tripati v. USDC-AZP
as 20-70366
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH SCOTT CONLON, Corizon Lawyer, PHYLLIS RANEY, Corizon Employee - Florence, Tempe, MEGHAN QUEEN, Trinity employee Florence and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Petitioner:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Jeffrey Smith v. Jake Hoberg
as 19-17308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY THOMAS SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JAKE HOBERG, in his personal and official capacity, AKA Jacob Charles Hoberg
In re: Carrie Johnson
as 19-506
Respondent:
BKD TWENTY ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., ARC RICHMOND PLACE REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, HORIZON BAY MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Petitioner:
In re: CARRIE JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
USA v. Tom Smith, III
as 18-2905
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TOM SMITH, III, also known as THOMAS SMITH, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
