Cases 11 - 20 of 6,885
Live Nation Entertainment Inc v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Entertainment Inc
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company afent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Love v. Kaiser Permanente Consolidated, et al.
as 24-3065
Plaintiff:
TAMARA LOVE
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE CONSOLIDATED and KAISER PERMANENTE EMPLOYER HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
USA v. Dawone Washington
as 24-5463
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAWONE WASHINGTON
Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and v. DOJ
as 24-5127
Plaintiff:
Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Taylor v. County of Washington, et al.
as 24-2998
Plaintiff:
JERMEL ARCILICIA TAYLOR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Sheriff LOPEZ, ALLISON BROWN and others
United States of America v. Williams (Bynum)
as 24-1253
Defendant:
WILLIAM BYNUM, ALAN ANDERSON, TERRENCE WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States v. Washington
as 24-7042
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TANNER DEAN WASHINGTON
Ewalan v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2918
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROTHWELL, Sergeant G-Unit B-Side, DICKERSON, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
