Cases 191 - 200 of 15,332
North American Science Associates, LLC v. Conforti et al
as 0:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
North American Science Associates, LLC and NAMSA
Defendant:
Michael Conforti, Pamela Conforti and Phoenix Preclinical Labs, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morrison County, Minnesota et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 0:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Morrison County, Minnesota, Richardson Township and Leigh Township
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Hooley v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad corporation
as 0:2023cv03704
Plaintiff:
Nate Hooley
Defendant:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad corporation doing business as Canadian Pacific
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101 Federal Railroad Safety Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
