Cases 221 - 230 of 101,202
GPM Investments, LLC d/b/a E-Z Mart v. Rehman
as 5:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
GPM Investments, LLC d/b/a E-Z Mart
Defendant:
Harriet Louise Rehman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams-Starr v. Black Women EYC - Retail et al
as 3:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Secunda A Williams-Starr
Defendant:
Black Women EYC - Retail and Seven Eleven Stores EYC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ortega v. Secure One Capital Corporation
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Secure One Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
John A. Mansour
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Isom v. Amazon.com
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Tyesha Natalie Isom
Defendant:
Amazon.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plantd Inc v. Kanda
as 3:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plantd, Inc.
Defendant:
Harshvardhan Kanda
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Tarantino v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Megan Tarantino
Defendant:
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McCormick v. Ethos Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Gina McCormick
Defendant:
Ethos Technologies, Inc. doing business as Ethos Life Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
