Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Jane Doe #1 et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2
Defendant:
Tracy Renaud, Laura B. Zuchowski, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Doe v. Pekoske et al
as 1:2021cv00264
Defendant:
Connie Nolan, David Pekoske, Loran Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jane Doe #1 v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv02339
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1
Defendant:
Loren Miller, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Tracy Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
ARTZ v. BLAKEY et al
as 2:2020cv04290
Respondent:
PATRICIA MCNAMARA, PATRICIA MAISANO, JOSEPH MEOLA and others
Petitioner:
TRUSTEE EDWARD JAMES ARTZ
Jane Does I, II, III et al v. Scalia et al
as 3:2020cv01260
Defendant:
Eugene Scalia, United States Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Plaintiff:
Friends of Farmworkers, Inc. d/b/a Justice at Work in its capacity as Employee Representative and Jane Does I, II, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
FIORANI v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv03200
Defendant:
KAREN HICKS, CHRISTABEL IFEOMA OBI, SHERRY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
ROASRIO "ROSS" FIORANI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DOE I, ET AL v. UPMC
as 2:2020cv00359
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE I and JANE DOE II
Defendant:
UPMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00955
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KOVALEV v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv05790
Defendant:
SHANNON G ZABEL, NANCY A KAMMERDEINER, PAULA WEISS and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
KOVALEV v. STEPANSKY, DMD et al
as 2:2019cv05579
Respondent:
JOHN DOE I, IRINA STEPANSKY, DMD and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-50
Petitioner:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
