Cases 21 - 30 of 1,544
Nguyen v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3844
Plaintiff:
DAI NGUYEN
Defendant:
K. WILLIAMS, Counselor, CC2, D. ZEPEDA, Counselor, D. GRAY, Counselor and others
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 4:2024cv02307
Defendant:
Tu Nguyen
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
In re: Olivia Tho-Xuan Thi Nguyen
as 2:2024rd00071
Unknown:
Olivia Tho-Xuan Thi Nguyen
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Nguyen v. Madsen et al
as 1:2024cv04794
Plaintiff:
Van Toan Nguyen
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Kenneth Madsen, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
In re Naturalization Ceremony 06/05/2024
as 5:2024mc80135
Unknown:
Sakineh Hosseinabadi, Mohammadhossein Akhbarizadeh, NFN Aakanksha and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Qian v. VinFast Auto Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv03956
Defendant:
Pham Nguyen Anh Thu, VinFast Auto Ltd., Nguyen Thi Van Trinh and others
Plaintiff:
Meng Qian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
United States of America v. Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
as 8:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Vanguard Group, Inc., and The VONS Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
Mai Trang Hoang, Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen and Sandy Mai Trang Hoang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 24-2364
Defendant:
THANH NGUYEN and Poway
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff:
NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant:
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
