Cases 21 - 30 of 435
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zaerpour et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Soheil Zaerpour and The People of the United States of America
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Barclays Bank plc and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
UBS Group AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Euroinvest Securities Limited et al v. Barclays Bank PLC
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Euroinvest Securities Limited and Murat Safin
Defendant:
Barclays Bank PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-3066
Petitioner:
John T. Pickering-George
Respondent:
Comissioner of Social Security, Joslyn Carter, AdministratorHead of NYC Department of Homeless Services(DHS), Shemella Lovel, Senior Director - Atlantic House Men's Shelter and others
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
Zaerpour v. UBS Group AG et al
as 1:2022cv07232
Plaintiff:
Scheil Zaerpour and Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant:
UBS Group AG, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor:
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
