Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah State Tax Commission et al
as 2:2020cv00547
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah State Tax Commission and John L. Valentine
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad
Intervenor:
Iron County, Emery County, Tooele County and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11501
Sanchez v. Beaver County Sheriff, et al
as 20-4073
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMERAN NOEL, FNU HESSENTION, NERCE ROBEN AVORY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREG PAUL REVERE SANCHEZ
Kenneth Baker v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 19-2548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Anthony SmithIn re: Anthony Smith
as 19-2478
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY SMITH
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Benjamin Dennerlein v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 19-2241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN DENNERLEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Bain v. Bain et al
as 2:2017cv01305
Plaintiff:
Nikole Ann Bain
Defendant:
Lynne Bain , Larry Bain , Mandy Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In re: Gary Robinson
as 17-1648
Petitioner:
In re: GARY ROBINSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
In re: George Durham
as 17-1466
Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE M. DURHAM
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Beaver County Utah v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Beaver County Utah
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Kevin Haugrad, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund v. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2016mc80076
Plaintiff:
Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund , Erie County Employees' Retirement System and Luc Dewulf
Defendant:
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. , Robert A. Rucker , Tile Shop, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
