Cases 21 - 30 of 244
Robert Koon v. Timothy Clark
as 21-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOLLAND KOON, a/k/a Robert Koon, a/k/a Robert H. Koon
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY CLARK, JORDAN WILLIAMS, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant:
NURSE SARAH LENTZ, DOCTOR SEAN JONES, TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 21-10731
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Berkeley County School District v. HUB International Limited
as 21-1691
Defendant:
HUB INTERNATIONAL SOUTHEAST, STANLEY J. POKORNEY, SCOTT POKORNEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and HUB INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST LIMITED
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BERKELEY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
USA v. Brantley Seymore
as 21-11991
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANTLEY SEYMORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Brantley Seymore
as 21-11990
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANTLEY SEYMORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brantley County Development v. Brantley County, GA, et al
as 21-11865
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSE MOBLEY, In Individual and Official Capacity as Commissioner, RAY GRIFFIN, In Individual and Official Capacity as Commissioner, BRANTLEY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRANTLEY COUNTY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC
William Garey v. James S. Farrin, P.C.
as 21-1478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON KENT CRUTHIS, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, BELINDA LEE STEINMETZ, ADILAH HANEEFAH-KHADI MCNEIL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL A. DEMAYO, HARDISON & COCHRAN, PLLC, HARDEE & HARDEE, LLP and others
US v. Thomas Jenkins, II
as 20-7562
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS BRANTLEY JENKINS, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
