Cases 21 - 30 of 3,315
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
United States of America v. Cook
as 24-846
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOEL COOK
Deng v. Henry, et al.
as 24-1960
Plaintiff:
TONY DENG
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HENRY, Deputy Warden, Cook Unit, ROCKY SUTTON, CO IV, UNKNOWN BARNES, Officer and others
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gardner et al v. Bridgewater Associates, LP et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Gardner and Paul Ross
Respondent:
Bridgewater Associates, LP, Bridgewater Associates Holdings, LLC, Michael McGavick and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Cutberto Viramontes, et al v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1437
Plaintiff:
CUTBERTO VIRAMONTES, CHRISTOPHER KHAYA, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, TONI PRECKWINKLE, KIMBERLY M. FOXX and others
Bridgewater Associates, LP et al v. Ross
as 3:2024cv00398
Petitioner:
Bridgewater Associates, LP, Bridgewater Associates Holdings, LLC, Michael McGavick and others
Respondent:
Paul Ross
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Targgart v. Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Todd Targgart
Defendant:
Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc., Ken Rice, George Palikaras and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
