Cases 21 - 30 of 219
James Garner v. Steven Kidd, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES H. GARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN KIDD, THOMAS COSTELLO, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner:
STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Garner v. Kibb et al
as 1:2022cv06299
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Steven Kibb and Thomas Costello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Costello et al
as 2:2022cv01388
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Justin Costello and David Ferraro
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Lipshutz et al v. Costello et al
as 1:2022cv04547
Plaintiff:
Solomon Lipshutz and Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Ellen M Costello, Grace E Dailey, Barbara J. Desoer and others
Wolfe v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04895
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolfe
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., Julie A. Schertell, William M. Cook and others
Kent v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., Shruti Singhal, Tony R. Thene and others
Justice, II v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., William C. Cook, Donna M. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02987
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., William C. Cook, Donna M. Costello and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
