Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Warner et al v. Crook County, Oregon et al
as 3:2008cv06327
Defendant:
Scott Cooper, Crook County, Oregon, David Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Eagle Peak, LLC and Kevin Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Roger Elseth, et al v. Vernon Speirs, et al
as 10-80130
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ROGER ARDEN ELSETH, PATRICIA ANN ELSETH and ALLEN ELSETH, guardian ad litem Patricia Ann Elseth, guardian ad litem Roger Arden Elseth
Defendant - Respondent:
VERNON SPEIRS, Chief Probation Officer of the County of Sacramento, DAVID GORDON, Superintendent Sacramento County Department of Education, RONALD TAM, Deputy Probation Officer and others
United States v. Gordon
as 10-5026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE DAVID GORDON
David Crosbie et al v. Endeavors Technologies Inc et al
as 8:2008cv01345
Defendant:
Peter Bondar, Richard Doyle, Endeavors Technologies Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Crosbie, Nicholas Nelson, Christopher Potts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In Re: Royal Manor Mgmt, Inc., et al
as 09-4432
Debtor:
In re: ROYAL MANOR MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.
Appellant:
ALISON GORDON and DAVID GORDON
Appellee:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gordon, et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
George David Gordon, Joshua Wayne Lankford and Dean Joseph Sheptycki
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Clermont York Associates, LLC. v. Gordon et al
as 1:2007cv07331
Petitioner:
Clermont York Associates, LLC.
Respondent:
David Gordon, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gordon et al v. Palumbo et al
as 1:2007cv06624
Defendant:
Jose Antonio Ruiz, Nancy S. Lieberman, Bella M. Goz and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon and Jacqueline Swiskey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
