Cases 21 - 30 of 56
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. et al
as 1:2012cv05373
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL , ATLANTIC COUNTY and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. , FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC. , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1464
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benita Arvizu v. Indymac Bank FSB et al
as 8:2011cv01159
Plaintiff:
Benita Arvizu
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co, Does, Douglas Trust No 1217 TD Bancorp and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-30571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Spreitzer et al v. Michitsch et al
as 2:2011mc00008
Plaintiff:
Gene A Spreitzer and Sheryl L Spreitzer
Defendant:
Patricia Anne Michitsch, David M Friedman, American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc and others
Ramon Rabago v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co et al
as 5:2010cv01917
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co and Does
Plaintiff:
Ramon Rabago
In re: El Veasta Lampley
as 10-56863
:
In the Matter of: EL VEASTA LAMPLEY
Appellant:
EL VEASTA LAMPLEY
Appellee:
MORGAN STANLEY, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO. and HOMEQ
Danny Scott et al v. IndyMac Bank FSB et al
as 2:2010cv07861
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co, Does and IndyMac Bank FSB
Receiver:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Danny Scott
Knippel et al v. Saxon Mortgage Services et al
as 2:2010cv01726
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., LPS Default Services, Inc., LPS Foreclosure Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Knippel and Thomas Knippel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
