Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Dana NesselIn re: Dana Nessel
as 23-1148
Petitioner:
In re: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
Christopher White v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-1092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General for the State of Michigan and MICHAEL G. FREZZA, Criminal Trials and Appeals
Christopher White v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General for the State of Michigan and MICHAEL G. FREZZA, Criminal Trials and Appeals
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
Nessel v. Laujor Estate Winery, LLC
as 2:2022cv12832
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Laujor Estate Winery, LLC
Nessel v. FKI Hardware, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01014
Defendant:
FKI Hardware, Inc., Hickory Hardware, Inc., Belwith International, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Nessel v. M & M Wines Corp.
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
M & M Wines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
White v. Nessel et al
as 2:2022cv12162
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen White
Defendant:
Dana Nessel and Micheal Frezza
Kensu v. Nessel
as 2:2022cv11834
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and Monique Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
