Cases 21 - 30 of 483
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10518
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Souza v. St. Anne's Credit Union
as 1:2021cv10472
Plaintiff:
Heather Souza
Defendant:
St. Anne's Credit Union and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Leavitt v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 1:2020cv12130
Plaintiff:
Allan M Leavitt
Defendant:
Lamontagne, Spaulding and Hayes, LLP, Stuart Parker, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv11583
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ruth Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Turner v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2020cv11530
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan, Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Turner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hajiabadi v. WOLF et al
as 4:2020cv10807
Plaintiff:
Mohammadmahdi Agheli Hajiabadi
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, John Doe 2, Matthew T. Albence and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Hajiabadi v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv10807
Defendant:
Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, John Doe 2, Acting Commissioner Mark A Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammadmahdi Agheli Hajiabadi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Bangura et al v. Woods et al
as 1:2020cv10687
Defendant:
Agent Doe 1, Agent Doe 4, Agent Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alishia Bangura, Jean Simon and Sawudatu Bangura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
