Cases 21 - 30 of 8,102
Kiser v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al.
as 24-2663
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE KISER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, TERRANCE JACKSON and DOES, 1-5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Warren v. Nanos, et al.
as 24-2601
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant:
CHRIS NANOS, Sheriff, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney, SAMANTHA WALKER, CES Dut and others
WALKER-JACKSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00635
Petitioner:
MARY A. WALKER-JACKSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Jackson, et al. v. City of Federal Way Police Department, et al.
as 24-2556
Plaintiff:
LAURA LEAH JACKSON and CORNELL STEFON DIJOHN BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIGO REAL ESTATE, other Tony Flaherty LLC and RESERVE AT SEATAC
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jackson v. New Haven
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS JACKSON
Defendant:
PETISIA ADGER, in their individual capacities, DARYLE BRELAND, in their individual capacities, LEE DEASE, Executor of the Estate of Leroy Dease and others
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
JACKSON HEWITT INC., v. ATR GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05284
Petitioner:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.,
Respondent:
ATR GROUP, LLC, MOHAMED DIAKITE and MARIAMA DIALLO
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
