Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Luis Flores-Andrade v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-3160
Petitioner:
LUIS FLORES-ANDRADE
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Maldonado v. Flores Drywall & Painting Inc et al
as 4:2015mc00995
Plaintiff:
William Maldonado
Defendant:
Flores Drywall & Painting Inc, Jose Flores, Luis Flores and others
Ryan et al v. Gencor Nutrients, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01209
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan , Marco Garza , Michael Aguero and others
Defendant:
GENCOR NUTRIENTS, INC. , GE NUTRIENTS, INC. , Jith Veeravalli and others
Respondent:
NDS Nutrition Products Inc
Ryan et al v. Gencor Nutrients, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01209
Plaintiff:
Michael Aguero, Robert Baker, Steven Berger and others
Defendant:
Direct Digital LLC, Dreambrands, Inc., Force Factor LLC and others
Respondent:
NDS Nutrition Products Inc
Ryan et al v. Gencor Nutrients, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv05682
Plaintiff:
Michael Ryan , Marco Garza , Michael Aguero and others
Defendant:
Gencor Nutrients, Inc. , GE Nutrients, Inc. , Jith Veeravalli and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jose Flores Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71045
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS FLORES RODRIGUEZ, AKA Jose Guadalupe Villalon
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
USA v. Luis Flores-Cartagena
as 13-20659
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS ALFONSO FLORES-CARTAGENA, also known as Luis Alfonso Flores, also known as Luis Flores, also known as Luis Alfonso Flores Cartagena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
