Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Michael Gorbey v. Black, et al
as 21-1207
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. SHIRK, SHU/USP-Lewisburg, C.O. RALEIGH, USP-Lewisburg, J. ORDONEZ, USP-Lewisburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
USA v. Michael Blashinsky
as 21-10301
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN BLASHINSKY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Gorbey v. S. Spaulding, et al
as 21-1049
Defendant / Appellee:
SHU LIEUTENANT SHIRK, DOCTOR EDINGER, USP Lewisburg, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael GorbeyIn re: Michael Gorbey
as 20-3622
Respondent:
A. DUTTRY, DR. EDINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. Joanna Olson, et al
as 20-3618
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. EDINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DR. JOANNA MARIE OLSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael Gorbey v. S. Spaulding, et al
as 20-3615
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, S. SPAULDING, WARDEN of USP-Lewisburg and STEPHEN SPAULDING, WARDEN of USP-Lewisburg
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Michael GorbeyIn re: Michael Gorbey
as 20-3605
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and ROBERT D. MARIANI
Michael GorbeyIn re: Michael Gorbey
as 20-3483
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, AKA Michael Feather-Gorbey, AKA Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and ROBERT D. MARIANI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Michael Gorbey v. Gass, et al
as 20-3168
Defendant:
MR. BOHLIN, Executive Assistant/Remedy Coordinator USP-Lewisburg, MR. MARR, G-Unit Counselor USP-Lewisburg, MR. GASS, Education Department USP-Lewisburg and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
