Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Gryder v. Concept Plus LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00261
Defendant:
ADP Totalsource, Concept Plus LLC, Virginia Employment Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burnley v. Sandground, Sr. et al
as 1:2020cv00770
Defendant:
Mark Sandground, Sr., WLG LLC, Mark Sandground, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Helene Burnley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke v. Capital One Bank(USA), N.A.
as 1:2020cv00742
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Plaintiff:
Mark Burke
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hankins v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00300
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Steve Herrick, Brian J. Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Bowen Hankins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bah v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2020cv00173
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Mark A. Morgan
Plaintiff:
Abdoulai Bah
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cambridge Retirement System v. Jeld-Wen Holding, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00112
Defendant:
Onex BP Finance LP, Gary S. Michel, Onex US Principals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Cambridge Retirement System
National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States Department Of Defense et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, Thomas B. Modly, Dr. Mark T. Esper and others
Plaintiff:
National Veterans Legal Services Program
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Combat Medical, LLC v. Esper et al
as 1:2019cv01609
Plaintiff:
Combat Medical, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department Of Defense, Ryan D. McCarthy and Mark T Esper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
