Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 357
Montana Environmental Information Center, et al v. Westmoreland Rosebud Mining LLC, et al
as 22-36002
Plaintiff / Appellee: MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, INDIAN PEOPLE'S ACTION, 350 MONTANA and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, U. S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, an agency within the U. S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING LLC and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 400
Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv12761
Petitioner: Regional Director Elizabeth K. Kerwin
Respondent: Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae: Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation
McMillian v. NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission
as 22-2772
Plaintiff / Appellant: James McMillian
Defendant / Appellee: NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission, Carmen Rojas, Asst. Commissioner of Human Resources, Chief/Captain Eldwrage Joseph and others
Defendant: Prior Dept. Chief Donald Sobers
Walter Rosales, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 22-16196
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTER J. ROSALES, LOUIS AYHULE GOMEZ, ESTATE OF KAREN TOGGERY and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, AMY DUTSCHKE, Regional Director, BIA and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15809
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15928
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner: In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
David F. Stix, Jr., et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 22-15603
Plaintiff: CITY OF FERNLEY
Intervenor Plaintiff: DAVID F. STIX, Jr. and DEENA E. EDMONSTON
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE
City of Fernley, et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 22-15400
Plaintiff / Appellant: CITY OF FERNLEY
Intervenor Plaintiff: DAVID F. STIX, Jr. and DEENA E. EDMONSTON
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15091
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER and others
Plaintiff: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a non-profit organization and WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, a federal department, AMY LUEDERS, in her official capacity as Southwest Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?