Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Yuma, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2019cv04410
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Incorporated, Watson Laboratories Incorporated, Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Yuma, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tucson, City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00167
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pima, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Pima, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tucson Medical Center v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2018cv00532
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Purdue Pharma LP, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gallien v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv08210
Defendant:
Phylis Hammer Smith, Andrey Golunov, Ruslana Golunov and others
Plaintiff:
Brad A Gallien
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Smith v. Allied Interstate LLC
as 2:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Lori Smith
Defendant:
Allied Interstate LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Inventure Foods Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04256
Plaintiff:
Ian Smith
Defendant:
Inventure Foods Incorporated, Terry E McDaniel, Macon Bryce Edmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Hutton
as 2:2017cv04125
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Dean Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
