Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Sterling International Consulting Group v. Google LLC
as 5:2020cv09321
Plaintiff:
Sterling International Consulting Group
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Sweepstakes Today, LLC v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2020cv08984
Plaintiff:
Sweepstakes Today, LLC
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., YouTube, LLC and Google LLC
Interested Party:
Sterling International Consulting Group, The Progressive, Inc., Genius Media Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Seppen v. Precigen, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv07586
Plaintiff:
Joseph Seppen
Defendant:
Randal J. Kirk, Rick L. Sterling, Precigen, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Raju Shah
Chen v. Precigen, Inc. f/k/a Intrexon Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv07442
Plaintiff:
Gang Chen
Defendant:
Precigen, Inc. f/k/a Intrexon Corporation, Randal J. Kirk and Rick L. Sterling
Petitioner:
Raju Shah
Abadilla v. Precigen, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv06936
Defendant:
Randal J. Kirk, Rick L. Sterling, Precigen, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Joseph Abadilla, Raju Shah, Joseph Seppen and others
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Clayton, M.D., Chris Lorino, Michael Lorino and others
PSG California LLC v. Sterling Hall
as 5:2019cv01609
Defendant:
Sterling Hall
Plaintiff:
PSG California LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lombrozo v. Sterling Jewelers Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02530
Defendant:
Lenny Credit, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, Sterling Jewelers Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Lombrozo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carl Gowdy v. Lindley R. Heher et al
as 2:2018cv07898
Defendant:
Susan S. Kim, Lia Martin, William N. Sterling and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Gowdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018at01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
