Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 316
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified: American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor: Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
State of TX v. EPA
as 23-40306
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11684
Plaintiff / Appellant: OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11685
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
United States Sugar Corporation, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11683
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Secretary of the Army v. KiewitPhelps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1842
Appellant: SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Appellee: KIEWITPHELPS
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant: Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Jemison & Partners, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1773
Appellant: JEMISON & PARTNERS, INC.
Appellee: SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
KY v. EPA, et al
as 23-5343
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL S. REGAN, Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Agency and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER
KY, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-5345
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENTUCKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF KENTUCKY, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL S. REGAN, Official Capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Agency and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS SMALL BUSINESS LEGAL CENTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?