Cases 21 - 30 of 212
Christopher Sanders v. Brian Starling, et al
as 21-12622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN STARLING, In his Individual Capacity, SEAN FOGARTY, In his Individual Capacity, WOODS, In his or her Individual Capacity and others
Carlos Henriquez v. Georgia Department of Revenue, et al
as 21-12567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS H. HENRIQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF GEORGIA, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and others
Armand Calhoun v. Adison Richards, et al
as 21-35598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMAND R. CALHOUN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADISON RICHARDS, PHILIP THORNTON, JENNIFER AMMONS and others
USA v. Michael Waite
as 21-12482
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAITE
Nelums et al v. Waites et al
as 3:2021cv02162
Plaintiff:
Janet Louise Nelums and Chris Nelums
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. John E. Waites, Jeffrey M. Tzerman Law Firm P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Bianca Digennaro v. Michael Malgrat, et al
as 21-12374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BIANCA DIGENNARO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL L. MALGRAT, KENNETH J.W. WAITE, FRED C. SIMS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
NELSON v. WAITE et al
as 1:2021cv01868
Plaintiff:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Defendant:
DAVID MARK WAITE, KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ, SARAH COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELSON v. PLOTZ et al
as 1:2021cv01855
Petitioner:
BRETT ANDREW NELSON
Respondent:
KENNETH MURRAY PLOTZ, DAVID WAITE, KAREN BLISS and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
United States of America v. Lee (Hisan Lee)
as 21-1641
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hibah Lee, Mark Gabriel, AKA Bubbles, Bobby Moore, Jr., AKA Pops and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Hisan Lee, AKA Ice, AKA Devontea Clark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
