Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Hopkins v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv02646
Defendant:
Actavis Incorporated, Purdue Pharma Incorporated, Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
F Kirk Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 3:2018cv08190
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Northwest Arizona Employee Benefit Trust
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kingman, City of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 3:2018cv08191
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Kingman, City of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cochise, County of v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2018cv00316
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Cochise, County of
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Arizona Counties Insurance Pool v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv01439
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Arizona Counties Insurance Pool
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Arizona School Alliance for Workers Compensation Incorporated v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv01201
Defendant:
Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP and others
Plaintiff:
Arizona School Alliance for Workers Compensation Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2012cv00876
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Jay Powell, BMO Financial Group, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Watson et al
as 2:2011mc00033
Plaintiff:
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Alan James Watson, Michael Potts, Cash Flow Financial LLC and others
Receiver:
Phillip S Stenger
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
