Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Davis v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-23948
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ann Davis
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Barthe et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80238
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Edwidge Barthe , Karen A Mancini , Robert Vincent Dubey and others
Defendant:
Kabaka McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gonzalez v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-24797
Plaintiff:
Raquel Gonzalez , Clarita Dudley , Mary Boggs and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, Holdings Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Gonzalez v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as TXS/7:13-cv-00457
Plaintiff:
Raquel Gonzalez , Clarita Dudley , Mary Boggs and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, Holdings, Inc. , Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Davis v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-21994
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Davis
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Davis v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-51091
Plaintiff:
Ann Davis
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13986
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
CARROLL v. THESTREET.COM INC et al
as 4:2012mc00046
Plaintiff:
GARY DONALD CARROLL
Defendant:
THESTREET COM INC, MELISSA ANN DAVIS, THIRD POINT ADVISORS LLC and others
Movant:
ERIC CAMIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
