Cases 21 - 30 of 699
EMPLOYER-TEAMSTERS LOCAL NOS. 175 & 505 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. FMC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04487
Plaintiff:
EMPLOYER-TEAMSTERS LOCAL NOS. 175 & 505 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION, MARK A DOUGLAS and ANDREW D SANDIFER
POONAM, INC., et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04514
Plaintiff:
POONAM, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION D/B/A QUICKLY MART FOOD STORE, MANSI PATEL, HARRY PATEL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HEEG v. FMC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04398
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. HEEG
Defendant:
FMC CORPORATION, MARK A. DOUGLAS and ANDREW D. SANDIFER
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 ET, AL. v. DB UTILITY CONTRACTORS, LLC
as 2:2023mc00143
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174, ET AL.
Defendant:
DB UTILITY CONTRACTORS, LLC doing business as D&B UTILITY, INC.
QUARRY VIEW CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. HALL et al
as 5:2023cv04381
Plaintiff:
QUARRY VIEW CONSTRUCTION, LLC t/d/b/a QUARRY VIEW BUILDING GROUP
Defendant:
BROOKE HALL, EQUES, INC. and ANDREW STOLTZFUS
MAHONEY v. NORDWALL
as 2:2023cv01651
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MAHONEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NORDWALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Gault v. Cohen
as 1:2023cv01763
Plaintiff:
Eddie D. Gault
Defendant:
Deborah L. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
