Cases 31 - 40 of 1,158
Hawkins v. Andrewjeski
as 23-2098
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN BROOKS HAWKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI, SUPERINTENDENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HAWKINS v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY et al
as NJ/2:23-CV-09322
Plaintiff:
HAWKINS and VERA HAWKINS
Defendant:
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC.
Pignatelli v. MSP Recovery, Inc. F/K/A Lionheart Acquisition Corp. II et al
as 1:2023cv23224
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pignatelli
Defendant:
MSP Recovery, Inc. F/K/A Lionheart Acquisition Corp. II, John H. Ruiz, Calvin Hamstra and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Wieder v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07406
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald and others
Floyd v. Quotient Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Quotient Technology, Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Smith v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07068
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
HAWKINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01168
Petitioner:
EUNICE HAWKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Wang v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06593
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Lorraine Hariton and others
O'Dell v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang, Nathan Smith and Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Kimberly Anstett, Jody Gessow and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Andrew Gessow
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
