Cases 31 - 40 of 1,260
Ramon Dent v. California TD Specialists et al
as 2:2023mc00134
Respondent:
Peer Street Funding LLC, California TD Specialists, CDEF Investment LLC and others
Petitioner:
Ramon Dent
Defendant:
Dent Estate, United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and others
Lunch Inc v. Redhouse Virtual Education LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07607
Defendant:
Anthony Lynn Scallion, Trisstar L Scallion, Redhouse Virtual Education LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Lunch Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tiffany Marie Johnson Trust v. Marks
as 3:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Marie Johnson Trust
Defendant:
Jordin Z Marks
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Brandon Michael Mann v. Eric J. Holcomb et al
as 2:2023cv05091
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Mann
Defendant:
Eric J. Holcomb, Bob Grennes, Tammy Tschetter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Johnson
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023at00479
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
