Cases 31 - 40 of 385
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wright et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2022cv04345
Plaintiff:
Bridget Wright and Laquita Smith
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Manju Cibi RN and Choreen Powell RN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
UBS Financial Services Inc. et al v. Smith
as 1:2022cv03410
Petitioner:
UBS Financial Services Inc. and UBS Credit Corp.
Respondent:
Bruce D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mohamed et al
as 1:2022cv03252
Defendant:
9224-3708 Quebec, Inc., Rahim Mohamed, Davies (Dave) Wong and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
