Cases 31 - 40 of 65
ADT Services AG et al v. Anthony Price
as 5:2011mc00027
Plaintiff:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Services AG
Defendant:
Anthony Price
SIPCO, LLC v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2011cv06503
Plaintiff:
SIPCO, LLC
Defendant:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
SIPCO, LLC v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 3:2011mc80268
Plaintiff:
SIPCO, LLC
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05149
Plaintiff:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Security One International, Inc. , Frank Gardiner , Claudio Hand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ram International Inc v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv05555
Plaintiff:
Ram International Inc. and Narender Agarwal
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Movant:
Underwriters Labortories Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Ram International, Inc. et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv05553
Plaintiff:
Ram International, Inc. and Narender Agarwal
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Desai et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2011mc80148
Plaintiff:
Vishva Desai and Philip J. Charvat
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
John Faulkner v. ADT Security Services, Inc., et al
as 11-16233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN FAULKNER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS, WEST, INC. and TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC.
Desai v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv04026
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Desai
Movant:
EMI, Inc.
Desai v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01925
Plaintiff:
Vishva Desai and Philip J. Charvat
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
