Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as LAE/2:14-cv-02891
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , SYNGENTA SEEDS, INC. and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
United States v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 3:2014cv00089
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1251
In re: Subpoena of David Berg
as 3:2014mc00001
Movant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company , Cargill, Incorporated , Ingredion Incorporated and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
as 2:2013cv02279
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Archer-Daniels-Midland Compan, et al v. Regis Paillardon
as 13-2220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY and ADM LATIN AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIS PAILLARDON
Archer Daniels Midland Company et al v. Paillardon
as 2:2012cv02227
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company and ADM Latin America Inc
Defendant:
Regis Paillardon
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Paillardon v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2012cv22693
Petitioner:
Regis Paillardon
Respondent:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Latin America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 2:2011cv02212
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Western Sugar Cooperative et al v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 2:2011cv03473
Plaintiff:
American Sugar Refining Inc, C and H Sugar Company, Inc., Imperial Sugar Corporation and others
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Cargill, Inc., Corn Products International, Inc. and others
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. Robinson Industrie
as 11-8001
Respondent:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Petitioner:
Robinson Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
