Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Gould et al v. O'Leary et al
as 1:2016cv10181
Defendant:
O'Leary, Daniel C. O'Leary, David A. Provencher and others
Plaintiff:
Gould, Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc., Michael Gould and others
Intervenor Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandes v. Briotte et al
as 1:2015cv12580
Plaintiff:
William M. Fernandes
Defendant:
Andre Briotte, Jr., Anthony D. Williams, Briane M. Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Attorney et al
as 1:2015cv11506
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdelgadir et al v. Telexelectric, L.L.L.P. et al
as 4:2015cv40028
Plaintiff:
Esam Abdelgadir , Rita Dos Santos and Joseph Shikhman
Defendant:
TelexElectric, LLLP, Telez Mobile, Holdings, Inc., Telex Mobile Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Attorney's Office v. Florentino
as 1:2014mc91338
Plaintiff:
U.S. Attorney's Office
Defendant:
Estefani Florentino
United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts
as 1:2014mc91335
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv40156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Telexelectric, LLLP et al
as 4:2014cv40154
Plaintiff:
Todd Cook
Defendant:
TelexElectric, LLLP, TELEX MOBILE HOLDINGS, INC., James M. Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools v. Coakley
as 1:2014cv13706
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools
Defendant:
Martha Coakley and The Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
