Cases 31 - 40 of 835
Everson v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv06451
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Everson
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CBS Broadcasting Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv07003
Plaintiff:
CBS Broadcasting Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv02236
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC., TIRZAH CHRISTOPHER and MEG ANDERSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
In re: Pitts
as 23-1244
Petitioner:
EDGAR NELSON PITTS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, CUNDIFF, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
GOLDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH M. GOLDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Sherrod v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 23-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO SHERROD
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, C HOWARD, UNKNOWN BEHLE and others
SNYDER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
MARY SNYDER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
DeJuan Thornton-BeyIn re: DeJuan Thornton-Bey
as 23-2057
Petitioner:
In re: DEJUAN B. THORNTON-BEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN D. CHRISTENSEN, C.O. B. FOGLEMAN and others
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
