Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. City of Pulaski, Tennessee
as 1:2018cv00061
Defendant:
City of Pulaski, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System v. UNUM Group et al (TV1)
as 1:2018cv00169
Defendant:
UNUM Group, Daniel J. Waxenberg, Steve Zabel and others
Plaintiff:
City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Administrative Proceedings File No. 2:18-1803212000-01 v. Bartlett City Court et al
as 2:2018mc00023
Respondent:
Bartlett City Court, Bartlett Police Department, B. Luff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee v. City of Brentwood, Tennessee
as 3:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
Milcrofton Utility District of Williamson County, Tennessee
Defendant:
City of Brentwood, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKevitz v. Silver City Resources Inc. (PLR1)
as 3:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Andrew McKevitz
Defendant:
Silver City Resources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Ashland City, Tennessee
as 3:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
Ashland City, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Price et al v. City of Memphis
as 2:2017cv02772
Plaintiff:
Willis Price , Kevin Kerr and Deunta Youngblood
Defendant:
City of Memphis
Movant:
Bradley Jetmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
City of Warren General Employees' Retirement System v. Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01167
Plaintiff:
City of Warren General Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. , Paul G. Boynton and Frank A. Ruperto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sweeney v. Sexton et al
as 1:2017mc00034
Plaintiff:
Teros A. Sweeney
Defendant:
Darrell Sexton and City of Knoxville
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
