Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Citrix System, Inc. v. Workspot, Inc.
as 3:2019mc80054
Defendant:
Workspot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Citrix System, Inc.
Respondent:
Puneet Chawla
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
Citrix Systems, Inc. v. LCN Techonology, Inc.
as 0:2015cv61994
Plaintiff:
Citrix Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
LCN Techonology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Citrix Systems, Inc. v. 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.
as 14-1240
Appellee:
01 COMMUNIQUE LABORATORY, INC.
Appellant:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
ACCOLADE SYSTEMS V CITRIX SYSTEMS
as 09-1509
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Accolade Systems LLC,
Defendant-Appellee:
Citrix Systems, Inc.
ORENSHTEYN V CITRIX SYSTEMS
as 08-1378
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Alexander S. Orenshteyn
Defendant-Appellee:
Citrix Systems, Inc.
Sanctioned Party-Appellant:
David Fink, Fink & Johnson and Timothy W. Johnson
ORENSHTEYN V CITRIX SYSTEMS
as 03-1427
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Alexander S. Orenshteyn
Defendant-Appellee:
Citrix Systems, Inc.
Citrix Systems, Inc:
Sanctioned Party-Appellant:
David Fink, Fink & Johnson and Timothy W. Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
