Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II v. Sebelius
as 3:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Amicu:
Ray Elbert Parker, American Center for Law and Justice , Todd Akin and others
Movant:
Steven J. Willis , Eve Ellingwood, American Civil Rights Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vuyyuru et al v. Jadhav et al
as 3:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Lokesh Vuyyuru , Virginia Gastroenterology Associates PC and Virginia Times, Inc.
Defendant:
Gopinath Jadhav, Southside Gastroenterology Associates, Ltd., Petersburg Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Global NAPS, Inc. v. Verizon New England Inc., et al.
as 1:2009mc00012
Plaintiff:
Global NAPS, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New England Inc., Global NAPS New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPS Networks, Inc. and others
Knight et al v. Lara, Shull & May, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01197
Plaintiff:
Ian Knight and Ian Knight SEP IRA
Defendant:
Lara, Shull & May, LLC and Frank T. Shull, IV
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00054
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
United States Of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00073
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company, Inc., PCI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
